A Litigation Management
Proposal
Submitted by
Suchocki & Associates, PC
One Summit Avenue, Suite 312
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
(817) 338-0088
@copyright
Outline
|
|
|
|
Objective |
|
The Management Method |
|
Litigation Management:
Definition |
|
Representative Categories: To
Be Defined |
|
Litigation Management |
|
Case Categories |
|
Discovery Categories |
|
Direct Reporting |
|
Advantages for Management |
Objective
|
|
|
|
To recommend a Management
Method that can: |
|
|
|
Maintain & increase quality
of representation. |
|
Provide comprehensive
visibility to management. |
|
Reduce overall litigation
costs. |
|
Create and maintain a plan for
the disposition of each case. |
|
Create a feed-back mechanism to
provide growth, refinement |
|
and/or re-definition. |
The Management Method
|
|
|
|
The proposed management method is a proven, effective method of
managing a large project that provides control, visibility and
accountability. |
|
|
|
It has a built-it mechanism for re-definition,
growth, feed back and fine tuning. |
|
This is a management tool used
by NASA to define, develop and test the space shuttle software. |
|
A firm member has personal
experience with NASA development of space shuttle software. |
|
Our firm has experience in
implementing a form of this management method. We previously managed
litigation for an elevator company throughout the State of Texas. |
Litigation Management
Definition
|
|
|
|
|
We propose to apply the
management method to Litigation Management. |
|
|
|
Organize each case into a
category, as a function of liability and damages. |
|
Define and assign a discovery
level for each category. |
|
In addition to standard
reporting, include a periodic personal briefing to management that will
provide: |
|
Visibility as to number of
cases in each category. |
|
Current accounting of attorney
fees and costs. |
|
Critical reporting of major
cases and category changes. |
|
Attorney accountability for
case development. |
|
Discussion of problems,
strategy and goals. |
|
An ongoing forum to control
costs. |
|
A basis for an action plan for
case disposition. |
Representative Categories
To be Defined
|
|
|
|
Liability |
|
0 to 20% Minimal Risk |
|
20 to 40%
Acceptable Risk |
|
40 to 60% Equal Risk |
|
60 to 80% High Risk |
|
80 to 100% Unacceptable Risk |
|
|
|
Damages |
|
Less that 10K D1 |
|
10K to 50K D2 |
|
50K to 100K D3 |
|
100K to 250K D4 |
|
250K to 500K D5 |
|
500K to 1M D6 |
|
|
|
|
Litigation Management
Case Categories
|
|
|
|
Category One |
|
Minimal Risk with D1- D2
Damages |
|
Level 1 Discovery |
|
Nuisance Settlement or Trial |
|
|
|
Category Two |
|
Minimal Risk with D2-D5 Damages |
|
Level 2 Discovery |
|
Defense Cost Settlement or
Trial |
|
|
|
Category Three |
|
Minimal Risk with D5 or Greater |
|
Level 3 Discovery |
|
Demand Risk |
Litigation Management
Case Categories
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category Four |
|
Acceptable Risk with D1-D4
Damages |
|
Level 2 Discovery |
|
Defense Cost Settlement or
Trial |
|
|
|
Category Five |
|
Acceptable Risk with D4 or
Greater |
|
Level 3 Discovery |
|
Demand Risk |
Litigation Management
Case Categories
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category Six |
|
Equal Risk with D1-D4 Damages |
|
Level 2 Discovery |
|
Defense Cost Settlement or
Trial |
|
|
|
|
|
Category Seven |
|
Equal Risk with D4 or Greater |
|
Level 3 Discovery |
|
Demand Risk |
|
|
Litigation Management
Case Categories
|
|
|
|
Category Eight |
|
High Risk with D1-D3 Damages |
|
Level 4 Discovery |
|
Demand Risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category Nine |
|
High Risk with D3 or Greater
Damages |
|
Level 4 Discovery |
|
Mediation |
|
|
Litigation Management
Case Categories
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category Ten |
|
Unacceptable Risk with any Damages |
|
Level 4 Discovery |
|
Mediation |
|
|
Litigation Management
Discovery Categories
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Interrogatories; Production;
Admissions; Disclosure |
|
Medical, Personnel Records and
Photographs |
|
Non-Stenographic Deposition of
Plaintiff |
|
Telephone Interview of Witnesses |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Interrogatories; Production;
Admissions; Disclosure |
|
Medical, Personnel Records and
Photographs |
|
Deposition of Plaintiff |
|
Interview/Deposition of
Witnesses |
Litigation Management
Discovery Categories
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Interrogatories; Production;
Admissions; Disclosure |
|
Medical, Personnel Records and
Photographs |
|
Deposition of Plaintiff |
|
Mediation |
|
Deposition of Critical
Witnesses |
|
Medical/Liability Expert, as
necessary |
|
|
|
Level 4 |
|
Interrogatories; Production;
Admissions, Disclosure |
|
Medical, Personnel Records and
Photographs |
|
Deposition of Plaintiff |
|
Depositions of Critical
Witnesses |
|
Liability Consultant |
|
Mediation/Settlement |
Litigation
Management
Direct Reporting to Management
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic reporting to
management by defense attorneys to include such items as: |
|
Comprehensive report of status
of all cases in manageable format. |
|
Number and category of cases. |
|
Red flags, problems &
concerns. |
|
Cases set for trial. |
|
Disposition dates for each
case. |
|
Summary of ongoing costs and
project costs, per case and total. |
|
Visibility for significant
litigation. |
|
Forum for discussion of
strategy and options. |
|
Forum for discussion of methods to control costs. |
|
Overall budget control. |
|
Action item list for follow up. |
Advantages For Management
|
|
|
|
Provides Management the opportunity for direct review and input
into defense strategies on a cooperative level. |
|
Defense counsel is directly
accountable for explaining status, rationale and strategy. |
|
Provides visibility into
significant cases for both liability/damages and costs. |
|
Strengthen the relationship of
trust, understanding and loyalty between defense counsel and client. |
|
Provides comprehensive
visibility into all litigation for a section of Texas. |
|
Provides a direct means of
controlling overall litigation costs. |
|
Develop a working relationship
and guideline for cost control |
|
Guard against protracted and
unnecessary discovery |
|
Generate and maintain
statistics on average cost per case |
|
Provides a goal oriented
disposition plan for each case |
|
|
|
|
|
|